Menu Close Menu

Blog

Can Your Case Be Challenged Under the Fourth Amendment?

Posted by Steve Karimi | Feb 25, 2020 | 0 Comments

Last week we discussed the Fourth Amendment and some scenarios during which it may come into play during an encounter with the police. To recap, the Fourth Amendment grants us certain safeguards when we are stopped and/or searched by law enforcement, and also prevents unlawfully seized items from being used against us as evidence in a criminal proceeding. 

The level of protection we are granted under the Fourth Amendment will depend upon a variety of factors, including what is being searched, where the search is being conducted, the overall circumstances involving the police action, and more. The Fourth Amendment can come into play during an arrest, searched performed subsequent to an arrest, a traffic stop, an investigation for evidence, and many other scenarios.

Challenges Involving the Fourth Amendment

The Fourth Amendment grants you certain rights. However, your attorney must be able to accurately spot where, when, and how law enforcement officials may have violated your rights in order to make sure that you are protected. There are a variety of circumstances where violations of your Fourth Amendment rights could present an opportunity for your defense attorney to attack all, or part, of the prosecution's case against you. The following list is by no means exhaustive but just serves as an example of some of the ways in which violations of the Fourth Amendment can be a part of your defense strategy.

A search warrant was not valid: There are various requirements for obtaining a search warrant. If, for example, a warrant did not accurately describe the area in which police may conduct a search, the warrant may not be valid and therefore the subsequent search may not be valid and evidence obtained during the search may not be admissible.

A search warrant was improperly executed: If a search warrant was not properly executed, the resulting search may be called into question and evidence seized during the search may not be admissible. For example, if the police obtained a warrant to search Apartment 1C of a building and they performed a search of the entire first floor and found controlled substances in Apartment 1B, it is possible that this search would be deemed improper and evidence collected during it deemed inadmissible.

Probable cause was not present. The police must have “probable cause” to believe a person performed a crime before placing that person under arrest. If the belief that leads to an arrest does not rise to the level of "probable cause," the arrest may be invalid. For example, if the police have a vague description of a suspect fleeing a robbery and arrest an individual who doesn't even fit the description, this may be deemed insufficient for probable cause grounds.

Seattle Criminal Defense Attorney

The Fourth Amendment can play a critical role in mounting an effective criminal defense. If your rights were violated at any point in time, some or all of the evidence against you may be inadmissible in court. If you are facing criminal charges, contact former King County prosecutor Steve Karimi online or by calling our office at 206-621-8777.

About the Author

Steve Karimi

Steve Karimi attended Pepperdine University School of Law. After graduation he worked as a prosecutor in Seattle where he gained valuable insight to the criminal justice system. Attorney Karimi uses his experiences as a prosecutor everyday only now he fights for the justice of those accused.

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us

If you were arrested or a loved one has been charged with a crime in Seattle or surrounding areas of Washington State, the Law Offices of Steve Karimi can help. Call 206-621-8777 during regular business hours or 206-660-6200 24 hours a day for a free consultation.

Seattle Defense Lawyer

Named a "rising star" in criminal defense by Washington Law and Politics magazine, Mr. Karimi is a former prosecutor for King County who uses his insight into prosecution strategies to protect his clients' rights in criminal court.