Menu Close Menu

Making a Murderer and the Law: Fictitious Findings

Posted by Steve Karimi | Feb 02, 2016 | 0 Comments

A popular documentary series has put criminal defense law in the spotlight. The Netflix original series "Making a Murderer" is an episodic documentary detailing the case of a Wisconsin man and his nephew's fight for liberty in a criminal defense case. The case of Steven Avery has gained national attention following the popularity of the documentary series. The series highlights allegations and key moments of what appears to be evidence planting and improper investigation practices.

Planted Evidence

In the documentary, we see a thorough and overzealous investigation of Steven Avery's home. For those unfamiliar with the series, Avery had been wrongfully convicted of a crime and was in a lawsuit against the jurisdiction responsible for his conviction, Manitowoc County. Very early on in the course of the lawsuit, a woman was murdered, with all the evidence pointing to Mr. Avery. Due to a conflict of interest, Manitowoc County officers were not allowed to do any investigation, and the initial police work was done by the neighboring county.

The documentary reports that his home is searched for nearly a week, when suddenly the key to the victim's car turns up in Steven Avery's room, in plain sight. The officers claimed that it was near a dresser that they had investigated, but only after two Manitowoc County officers were on the premises. The documentary also heavily suggests that some blood was planted in the victim's car as well. When it comes to trial, the defense team highlights this and makes several motions to remove the evidence due to its suspicious nature, yet they are all denied by the judge. The documentary also suggests that at even the slightest suggestion that officers involved in the search may have acted maliciously, the prosecutor cracks down hard on the case as a sort of punishment for suggesting that cops are anything less than infallible.

Do Officers Really Plant Evidence?

While an air of confrontation between citizens and law enforcement does more harm than good, the truth of the matter is that some cops do plant evidence. An article from the Free Thought Project highlights a Florida officer's remarks on his process for planting evidence. Similarly, a Philadelphia officer has also admitted to planting evidence as well. The Innocence Project, who was involved in Avery's initial exoneration, also reports events in Alabama involving police planting evidence.

If you believe you are the victim of planted or fictitious evidence, you should discuss it with your attorney. A skilled criminal defense attorney will be able to motion to remove, or suppress, the evidence, or at least modify how it is to be used in court. Motions to suppress evidence have many specific rules to them, however, suppressing harmful evidence can be the key to avoiding a conviction.

If you or a loved on is facing criminal charges, contact criminal defense attorney Steve Karimi today.

About the Author

Steve Karimi

Steve Karimi attended Pepperdine University School of Law. After graduation he worked as a prosecutor in Seattle where he gained valuable insight to the criminal justice system. Attorney Karimi uses his experiences as a prosecutor everyday only now he fights for the justice of those accused.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us

If you were arrested or a loved one has been charged with a crime in Seattle or surrounding areas of Washington State, the Law Offices of Steve Karimi can help. Call 206-660-6200 24 hours a day for a free consultation.

Seattle Defense Lawyer

Named a "rising star" in criminal defense by Washington Law and Politics magazine, Mr. Karimi is a former prosecutor for King County who uses his insight into prosecution strategies to protect his clients' rights in criminal court.